H1N1 is a National Emergency? Why?

According to the CDC, swine flu infections have already peaked, and the pandemic is on its way out. Peak infection time was the middle of October, where one in five U.S. children experienced the flu, says the CDC. Out of nearly 14,000 suspected flu cases tested during the week ending on October 10, 2009, 99.6% of those were influenza A, and the vast majority of those were confirmed as H1N1 swine flu infections. (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/)

Even though the H1N1 pandemic appears to have peaked out, U.S. President Barack Obama has now declared a national emergency over swine flu infections. The reasoning behind such a declaration? According to the White House, it’s designed to "allow hospitals to better handle the surge in patients" by allowing them to bypass certain federal laws.


That’s the public explanation for this, but the real agenda behind this declaration may be far more sinister. Declaring a national emergency immediately gives federal authorities dangerous new powers that can now be enforced at gunpoint, including:
• The power to force mandatory swine flu vaccinations on the entire population.
• The power to arrest, quarantine or "involuntarily transport" anyone who refuses a swine flu vaccination.
• The power to quarantine an entire city and halt all travel in or out of that city.
• The power to enter any home or office without a search warrant and order the destruction of any belongings or structures deemed to be a threat to public health.
• The effective nullification of the Bill of Rights. Your right to due process, to being safe from government search and seizure, and to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination are all null and void under a Presidential declaration of a national emergency.

None of this means that federal agents are going to march door to door arresting people at gunpoint if they refuse the vaccine, but they could if they wanted to. Your rights as an American are no longer recognized under this national emergency declaration.
What emergency?
The declaration of this national emergency seems suspicious from the start. Where’s the emergency? The number of people killed by swine flu in the United States is far smaller than the number of people killed each year from seasonal flu, according to CDC statistics. People obviously aren’t dropping dead by the millions from H1N1 influenza. Most people are just getting mild flu symptoms and a few days later they’re fine.

So where’s the emergency? The only emergency I can see is the emergency fabricated by Big Pharma to sell more vaccines. By declaring a national emergency over the H1N1 pandemic. Obama is playing right into their hands.
I find the timing of all this curious. Two days ago, New York gave up on its efforts to require mandatory vaccinations of health care workers.  This was designed to defuse a large number of planned protests from health freedom-conscious people who don’t want government-mandated chemicals pumped into their veins.
The planned protests in New York would have fueled yet more resistance among health care workers across the country, and had it been allowed to continue, it could have resulted in a huge nationwide backlash against swine flu vaccines. By backing off the vaccine mandate and blaming it on a vaccine shortage, and then having Obama declare a national emergency, our state and national leaders have halted the protests and put in place a pro-vaccine Big Brother mandate that can be enforced at gunpoint.

Big Pharma must be pleased with all this. With these emergency powers in place, all that’s necessary to force vaccinations upon the entire population is a larger supply of the vaccines — and that’s coming in November.

Hate Crime Bill Will END Free Speech

The U.S. Senate has passed the homosexual hate-crimes bill and will now send it to President Obama to sign it into law. This bill is a trojan horse to legitimize the creation of more laws that will completely obliterate the 1st amendment of the United States.

Many homosexual organizations say this is a victory, however they are just being used to further infringe on Americans rights to free speech.

In a 68-29 vote, senators passed 2010 National Defense Authorization Act, which includes the hate crimes measure that adds “sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” as well as disability, to the current categories — such as race, religion and gender — protected from hate crimes. The House of Representatives voted 281-146 on Oct. 8 for the same defense legislation, which was used as a vehicle for the hate-crimes measure though it is not directly related to the controversial provision. President Obama has said he would sign the bill.
Any “hate crimes” bill is a disaster for the 1st amendment and leads into the direction of a nanny government… we are all grown-ups, correct? When someone puts you down whether it’s about race, gender, sexual orientation do we really want the federal government and the police to get involved in such petty affairs? And shouldn’t the police and the government be investing their time on more serious situations? Any ‘hate crimes’ bill is just a step towards the end of the 1st amendment and stepping into the direction of a nanny government, handing out fines and putting people in prison for hate speech.

I’m not implying that gay rights aren’t a good thing, I think anyone of any sexual orientation, gender, etc. should have a right to marry, but this hate crimes bill is nothing more than a foot-in-the-door for other tyrannical regulations that will criminalize any type of speech.

This bill could lead to an age of “Pre-Crime” and “ Preventive Detentions“, if say the FBI suspects you of potentially committing a hate crime you can be prosecuted and detained even if no crime was even committed. It can also lead to cyber-bullying laws which could mean an expensive fine or prison time for internet bullying, this bill can also lead to ‘political hate laws’ where any dissent against the government or its policies could make you a political prisoner.

The White House is already planning to create an "enemies list" where any dissent against its policies can land many into a permanent White House database. The U.S. Government and Homeland Security have established its hatred for dissidents in this country, they have established that anti-New World Order groups, Alternative Media Outlets (like this one) are potential violent terrorist tools. Anything about the U.S. Constitution, any partisan activists or any civil disobedience of any kind is now considered potential violent extremism by Homeland Security.

The  unclassified Homeland Security memo even says people who are concerned about loss of U.S. sovereignty, illegal immigration and gun-control who are genuinely upset about encroaching freedom may be considered a potential insurgents against the U.S. government! Even liberal environmental activism, anti-war activism is considered potential violent extremism.

When you think of the phrase “hate crimes” remember that hate speech is a form of free speech and protected by the 1st amendment of the Bill of Rights and Constitution. The whole point of free speech is to protect unpopular speech like hate speech. When Obama signs this hate crimes bill into law the government will officially turn free speech into a criminal act, and soon it will become a terrorist/extremist act if Homeland Security (aka: the American Gestapo) gets its way.

Three 9/11 Heroes Dead in Five Days

Thanks to Stephanie Gaskell, New York Daily News Staff writer, I heard of this shocking news, which New York City and the US governments seemingly refuse to let sink into their thick heads and even thicker skin. Thousands of first responders are in dire health conditions, and consequently dire financial and familial conditions, due to illnesses contracted while working at Ground Zero following 9/11.


In this case Robert Grossman, a police office who worked at Ground Zero following 9/11, died of cancer on Friday, October 9. Family members and First Responder activists rightly blame their deaths on the incredible array of poisons released into the air after the explosions and subsequent pyroplastic collapse of the Twin Trade Towers and subsequently Tower Seven.

Stephen Grossman, whose son Robert died of cancer at the age of 44, commented that “Everybody is denying that this stuff is connected to 9/11.” And right he is. Robert Grossman was a police officer in Harlem who worked at Ground Zero for several weeks after 9/11. His father added, “He never once said he was sorry he went down there. None of them walked away even though they all knew it was really dangerous.”

The very day after Grossman passed, Firefighter Richard Mannetta, 44, died of cancer. The preceding Wednesday, 37-year old Police Office Cory Diaz died of cancer. Stephen Grossman pointed out, “Unfortunately, it’s just going to happen more and more.” He added that there are still many more first responders, in fact, thousands of them, who are sick.

Adding a tone of righteous irony, he said “This country just says, ‘That’s fine. We’ll just wait another 15 to 20 years and you’ll all be dead and we’ll all be sorry. This country is [or should be] better than that.”

What hit the victims?

The documentary Dust to Dust catalogs some of the 2,500 contaminants that erupted from the explosions of the World Trade Center towers, Tower Seven and the two, fuel-laden jetliners, turning into a toxic gray dust that hung in the air as well as settled in people’s lungs and on area streets, vehicles, buildings, residences, both outside and inside the city for months . . .

Over 400 tons of asbestos, which once inhaled in any quantity cannot be expelled by the lungs

90,000 liters of jet fuel containing benzene, a carcinogen that suppresses the immune system and causes leukemia

Mercury from over 500,000 fluorescent lights that is toxic to the nervous system, and damaging especially to the kidneys

200,000 pounds of lead and cadmium from personal computers, toxic to the respiratory track, especially damaging to kidneys

Polycystic aromatic hydrocarbons that cause lung, laryngeal and throat cancers

130,000 gallons of transformer oil with PCBs, causing serious skin rashes and liver damage

Crystalline Silica from 420,000 tons of concrete, sheetrock and glass (tiny particulates that lodge in heart, causing ischemic heart disease)

. . . and so on and on and on . . .

I suggest you read the full review to get the full picture of what these heroic people were up against and what they have had to live through and in many cases die from. The tale includes the lies told by the EPA, the New York City and US governments that minimalized the dangers of the environmental catastrophe, the worst in the history of the United States.

The lies were told to speed the return to work of Wall Streeters, as well as to maximize the elimination of the  Ground Zero crime scene. The evidence was whisked away in eight months, with men and women working round the clock, while Mayor Rudy Giuliani had a year and a half to complete the work, and in that time, allow for investigators to scour the scene for clues.

It’s no wonder, that as Ms Gaskell reports, “”The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act -- named after an NYPD detective who died from his post-9/11 ailments -- is still sitting in Congress, and Grossman and others are urging lawmakers to act now.” That is for the men and women who acted “now” when the call came on 9/11 to help. Why can't the members of Congress live up to the integrity and strength of its selfless First Responders!

John Feal, founder of the FealGood Foundation added, “These three deaths are proof that we need this bill passed today -- not a year from now.” Why, indeed, wasn’t it folded into the present health reform bill being hammered out in Congress, that is, if those hammerheads can get anything done!

The bill would put aside $10 billion (most likely less than Wall Street’s bonuses this year) for medical care for hundreds of first responders who have since become ill, though doctors amazingly have not yet correlated these illnesses with the World Trade Center. Given the shotgun blast of what those men were hit with, one wonders where those doctors’ heads are.

As Kenny Specht, a 40-year-old firefighter who worked with the NYPD on 9/11 and was subsequently diagnosed with thyroid cancer three years ago said, “The facts are indisputable. This week alone proves what we’ve been saying is absolutely occurring.” But never let it be said that our government rushes to help its heroes, whether in New York City or Iraq or Afghanistan. It’s too busy protecting the health and well-being of the insurance industry and the stock market, the defense industry, etc., which has got to change.

Feal added that the deaths of Grossman, Diaz and Mannetta in a span of five days should be hard to ignore. “How do you get this high cluster of serious cancer in just people that worked the pile? That isn’t a coincidence.” No, it isn’t, Mr. Feal. Nor is the neglect of the bravest, the finest, and the most dutiful. But that’s gotta change too. Or else they can send the Wall Streeters, AIG-ers and other clowns to the next catastrophe at home or abroad. And god help us!

Every time the media reports the unemployment numbers, it reminds me of George Orwell’s book, 1984. In the legendary book, a governmental organization referred to as the “Ministry of Truth” would report through the telescreens that the price of chocolate was going down. Winston Smith, the lead character of the book, knew good and well that the price of chocolate was not going down but was actually going up. We are certainly living in Orwell’s world! The difference between ours and the fictional world of Orwell, is that we are not being propagandized about chocolate, but rather unemployment statistics. The controlled news media always attempts to “butter up” the bad numbers, by putting a positive spin on the fact that we are losing our jobs, month after month.

The truth of the matter is that America is in deep, deep trouble and all the gutless globalist lapdogs in the media can do is lie to the people, trying to convince them that we are not in a depression — it’s only a “recession” — and it will soon be over. The deception is intended to get the American people, true to the failed Keynesian economic model, to spend money they don’t have, in a hopeless attempt to apply the defibrillation paddles to the dying patient which is the American economy. They will never tell you the patient is dying. They will never tell you why the patient is dying.


Furthermore, I have to laugh when I read statements like those of Don Miller from Money Morning when he said in a recent column about the horrendous September unemployment numbers,

“The latest data suggest the odds are increasing that the economy may be suffering through its second ‘jobless recovery’ in eight years.”

I have news for Don and all of people in the media and elsewhere who still have their heads in the sand about what is really going on in America. Listen up! Hear me! There isn’t going to be a recovery! You cannot have a recovery without jobs! And you are never going to see our jobs return without a reversal of the policies of globalization which put America into this economic mess.


It isn’t difficult to see the devastation that the policies which gave us the “global economy” have wrought upon America and her people. American companies cut 371,000 jobs in July.  Not surprisingly, August wasn’t much better. Mike Larsen at Money and Markets puts it this way,
 
“In the week ending August 29: 570,000 Americans filed for first-time jobless benefits. The number of Americans who had previously filed and still remain on the jobless rolls was 6.234 million.


“While those numbers are down somewhat from their March highs, they’re far, far above what would be considered normal. The average reading for initial claims over the past 42 years is just under 360,000.

“Then there’s this week’s report from ADP Employer Services. It showed the economy shedding another 298,000 jobs in August. While that was down from 360,000 a month earlier, it also marked the 19th straight month we’ve lost jobs as a nation. The cumulative tally: Almost 6.9 million jobs down the drain!”


September’s numbers are not much better. Reuters news service recently reported that U.S. employers cut another 260,000 jobs last month. Hence, building on Larsen’s numbers, we’ve now gone 20 straight months with a hemorrhaging U.S. job market and there’s no end in sight.


These are astronomical numbers! Add this figure to the already overwhelming number of job losses that we’ve seen since the signing of the NAFTA agreement in 1993, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist (or an economist, for that matter) to see the effects of globalization upon our country. Yet, do we see any sign of reversal of those same policies? Quite the contrary.

In fact, anyone arguing for a common sense rescission of WTO agreements, a return of our military to our own soil, and an end to the flood of migrant workers coming to this country, is referred to with such disdainful pejoratives as “isolationist,” “protectionist,” and even “xenophobic.”

A perfect example of the mindset of out-of-touch elitism that has permeated globalist circles can be seen in the Foreign Affairs article titled, The Outsourcing Bogeyman by Daniel Drezner, assistant political science professor at the University of Chicago. Drezner pontificated in his May 2004 article,

“Should Americans be concerned about the economic effects of outsourcing? Not particularly. … The creation of new jobs overseas will eventually lead to more jobs and higher incomes in the United States. Because the economy — and especially job growth — is sluggish at the moment, commentators are attempting to draw a connection between offshore outsourcing and high unemployment. But believing that offshore outsourcing causes unemployment is the economic equivalent of believing the sun revolves around the earth: intuitively compelling but clearly wrong.”

What elitist arrogance! And what an insult to the intelligence of the average, every day American workers — who, by the hundreds of thousands, have watched their factories close and their jobs disappear to foreign countries in the post-NAFTA economy! I would like to say to Mr. Drezner that denial is not a river in Egypt. Why don’t you spend some of your millions and take a trip to Motown and tell your philosophy to the unemployed auto workers there?

Mr. Drezner concludes,

“Until robust job growth returns, the debate over outsourcing will not go away — the political temptation to scapegoat foreigners is simply too great.“The refrain of ‘this time, it’s different’ is not new in the debate over free trade. In the 1980’s, the Japanese variety of capitalism — with its omniscient industrial policy and high nontariff barriers — was supposed to supplant the U.S. system. Fifteen years later, that prediction sounds absurd. During the 1990’s, the passage of NAFTA and the Uruguay Round of trade talks were supposed to create a ‘giant sucking sound’ as jobs left the United States. Contrary to such fears, tens of millions of new jobs were created. Once the economy improves, the political hysteria over outsourcing will also disappear.”

Tens of millions of new jobs were created since NAFTA? Where are they, Mr. Drezner? Perhaps in government think tanks and academic egg heads who’ve never gotten their carefully-manicured hands dirty because they’ve never done a real day’s work in their entire lives?


Let’s talk for a moment about that “giant sucking sound” that Ross Perot predicted and that globalist/elitist Drezner likes to discount. Several months ago, I pulled the official NAFTA trade deficit numbers directly off the U.S. Census Bureau web site. These are the official numbers, according to the governments own statisticians.

In the years preceding the signing of the NAFTA agreement, the U.S. trade deficit hovered around even with Mexico give or take a billion or two. In 1991, the U.S. enjoyed a $2.1 billion trade surplus, meaning we exported more dollars worth of goods to Mexico than we imported. In 1992, that number was over $5.3 billion. In 1993, the year NAFTA was signed, American workers enjoyed a $1.6 billion trade surplus. The following year, the effects of NAFTA hadn’t yet hit the American economy. The U.S. still experienced a $1.3 billion surplus. However, that was the last year for any surplus.

By 1995, just two years after the passage of NAFTA, the U.S. economy began feeling the effects in a major way. We went from having a $1.3 billion trade surplus in 1994, to having a $15.8 billion trade deficit the following year, and the figure has climbed almost without exception every year. By 2007, the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico was a staggering $74.6 billion. It’s important to note that NAFTA is only one trade agreement. There are several such agreements that our government has made with impoverished countries, including the Central American Free Trade Agreement, passed by the U.S. Senate on June 30, 2005 and signed by George W. Bush on August 2nd of the same year.

Nearly every one of the countries covered by the CAFTA-DR agreement are highly impoverished, according to the CIA World Fact Book. Here’s the brief rundown:


• Guatemala — Over 75% of the population lives below the poverty line

• Honduras — “one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere”

• El Salvador — “GDP per capita is roughly half that of Brazil, Argentina, and Chile... With the adoption of the US dollar as its currency, El Salvador has lost control over monetary policy and must concentrate on maintaining a disciplined fiscal policy.”

• Nicaragua — “Nicaragua, one of the hemisphere’s poorest countries, faces low per capita income, massive unemployment, and huge external debt... Nicaragua qualified in early 2004 for some $4 billion in foreign debt reduction under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative.” Half the population lives beneath the poverty line.

• Costa Rica — Fairs better than the rest, the wealthiest of these countries. The only Central American country where citizens are not leaving in search of opportunities.

• Dominican Republic — 1 out of every 4 live in poverty.

Given the dire condition of these nations’ economies, how could “President” George W. Bush make the case that having a free trade agreement with these impoverished Central American countries be in the best interest of American citizens and workers? How could American exporters — what’s left of them — expect to gain from a market where the people are too impoverished to buy? The truth of the matter is that haven’t, and they won’t.


Mr. Drezner’s chief problem, along with other Establishment elitists like him, is that he has selective statistics. Those he would call “protectionists” also have statistics. The real difference is that while the statistics produced by Drezner’s ilk is produced in the academic meat grinder to be vomited out in globalist publications, ours is backed by indisputable reality — knowing that the average American doesn’t need academic, media, or government statisticians telling them how good they have it. The numbers the American people look at are their bank accounts, their credit scores, their mortgage payments, their heating and grocery bills, and the price of gas. Increasingly, despite Mr. Drezner’s high rhetoric, Americans have been looking at the digits on their unemployment checks.

The only logical conclusion is that international trade agreements are not designed to benefit the United States, its people, its workers, or its future. They are designed to benefit the poorest countries, at the expense of the American people, leveling the “playing field”, lowering the American standard of living down to the “sustainable” level of third-world status. In other words, unemployment in America, the loss of our jobs, the shrinking of the American way of life, the eradication of our freedom to travel, the elimination of the middle class is socially and environmentally “sustainable.” The wealth of the American people is to be redistributed to the poorest nations, in accordance with chapter 3 of Agenda 21. Our consumption patterns have to be changed in accordance with chapter 4 of Agenda 21. We’ve been sold out by globalist scum, and nothing is ever going to change unless the people understand that this is a part of a deliberate agenda. It isn’t incompetence on the part of our “elected” officials. It isn’t a recession. It isn’t a bad economic downturn. It’s the effects of globalism. Period! We are reaping the natural results of policies that are designed to bankrupt our country.

I hear people say, all of the time, regarding the economy, “it will come back.” Sorry to burst your bubble, but no it won’t! It will never come back until the WTO trade agreements which put us into this mess are rescinded. That won’t happen until the appropriate pressure is applied to Washington by the people and by our state lawmakers who must be pressured to go to Washington and demand the changes.

And if you people who call yourselves “Democrats,” think your buddy Obama is any better than Bush was, then I ask why hasn’t he rescinded these treaties which have obviously been so detrimental to our country? Why haven’t the unions — which have seen their memberships and dues decline — done more to demand a revoking of the international trade agreements that have brought America to its knees? Keep in mind, it was the unions which helped put Clinton in office, who then stabbed them and all  American workers in the back by promoting NAFTA after promising to oppose it. It was Bill Clinton who established the President’s Council on Sustainable Development to kick start Agenda 21 implementation in the United States after the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. Agenda 21 implementation mandates the redistribution of wealth from developed to developing countries. It is the reason why your jobs have left. It is Bill’s wife, Hillary Clinton, who currently serves as head of the U.S. State Department, which is the chief agency of the United States government that implements the UN agenda of “sustainability” in America.

When will the American people ever realize that there is no difference between parties? We are not red states, blue states, conservatives, liberals, Republicans, or Democrats. We are Americans. It is about time we dispelled with the labels that the social engineers have developed to divide us — and that we’ve so freely embraced for ourselves — and began to act like true countrymen.

An ancient Roman philosopher named Cicero once said, “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.”

As I write these words, Ireland has just voted for a second time on the Lisbon Treaty, the Constitution of the European Union. Unlike the first time where they voted it down last year, they just approved it by a margin of 67 to 33 percent. Their government’s fear campaign of economic doom and gloom was the chief reason for the voters who favored it at the polls, according to exit polls. In other words, they were willing to hand the sovereignty of their country over to a regional governing body on the promise of economic prosperity.

They bought the same globalist lie for which America fell when we accepted GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and many other foreign trade entanglements. If Poland and the Czech Republic follow Ireland — and they are expected to do so — we can look forward to a new European presidency and Secretary of State to be formed. Ireland will eventually cease to exist, as the sovereignty of all of the 27 member countries of the EU will be gradually chipped away, until there is nothing left.


As Americans tail gate, drink beer, and watch their football games, they don’t have time to worry about the fate of the Irish, the Poles, or the Czechs. But they would be do well to learn the lessons of Europe. As the globalist thieves have taken Ireland, so too they come for the west.

Arnie's Ammo Law

Second Amendment advocates and other defenders of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are outraged by California Gov. Schwarzenegger’s scheme to force all law-abiding gun owners in the state to submit data to be inserted in a database when they purchase ammunition.

It makes sense California would enact such a law. The state is lorded over by an avowed Nazi.


”I admired Hitler, for instance, because he came from being a little man with almost no formal education up to power. And I admire him for being such a good public speaker,” Arnie said in the documentary Pumping Iron. The producer of the film, George Butler, considers Schwarzenegger a ”flagrant, outspoken admirer of Hitler.”

In a book proposal, according to the New York Times, Butler also said he had seen Mr. Schwarzenegger playing ”Nazi marching songs from long-playing records in his collection at home” and said that the actor ”frequently clicked his heels and pretended to be an S.S. officer.”

In response to Butler’s accusation, Schwarzenegger told the newspaper in 2003 that he despises Hitler.

He does? If so, why does Schwarzenegger wear a belt buckle bearing the SS Totenkopf, a Nazi SS insignia? Schwarzenegger appeared on the cover of Time Magazine on June 25, 2007, with Michael Bloomberg — who also has contempt for the Second Amendment — wearing the death’s head belt buckle. He wore it again nine months later in the March 2008 issue of Esquire Magazine.

Schwarzenegger proudly displayed the death’s head buckle a few months ago at the CeBIT 2009 IT conference in Hanover, Germany.

Schwarzenegger’s late father, Gustav, voluntarily applied to join the Nazi Party in 1938 when it was still illegal in Austria. He also voluntarily applied to become a member of the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary wing, on May 1, 1939. He was a Hitler-worshiping brownshirt.

Arnie invited Austrian president Kurt Waldheim to his wedding in 1986 after it emerged that the former UN secretary general had long concealed that he fought in a German army commando accused of atrocities.

All of this may be incidental to Arnie’s signing of AB962, the California ammo bill. But then, considering Arnie’s flagrant display of an SS insignia, it does not seem likely.

Nazis feared an armed public. Soon after grabbing power in 1933, the Nazis conducted massive searches and seizures of firearms from political opponents. “After five years of repression and eradication of dissidents, Hitler signed a new gun control law in 1938, which benefited Nazi party members and entities, but denied firearm ownership to enemies of the state,” writes Stephen P. Halbrook.

“History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing,” Hitler said.

“The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928,” writes Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership. “The 1928 law was enacted by a center-right, freely elected German government that wanted to curb ‘gang activity,’ violent street fights between Nazi party and Communist party thugs. All firearm owners and their firearms had to be registered. Sound familiar? ‘Gun control’ did not save democracy in Germany. It helped to make sure that the toughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed.

In California it is much the same — the state, the toughest criminal on the block, will now have a monopoly on gun possession while the law-abiding citizens will be forced to jump through hoops in order to realize the constitutional right to own a firearm.

It is ironic that Schwarzenegger signed this bill. He is an avowed Nazi that takes pride in wearing the same insignia as the SS. It is a symbol representing not only the secret police and naked totalitarian power, but the Nazi death cult responsible for killing tens of millions of innocent humans.

Millions of them would have lived a lot longer if they had firearms and fought back against the people Arnold Schwarzenegger worships.